{"id":4294,"date":"2015-03-12T11:57:21","date_gmt":"2015-03-12T11:57:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/?p=4294"},"modified":"2016-10-24T05:40:46","modified_gmt":"2016-10-24T05:40:46","slug":"the-tree-issue-in-titirangi-is-an-example-of-why-land-should-move-to-public-ownership","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/2015\/03\/the-tree-issue-in-titirangi-is-an-example-of-why-land-should-move-to-public-ownership\/","title":{"rendered":"The Tree issue in Titirangi is an example of why land should move to public ownership"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/2015\/03\/the-tree-issue-in-titirangi-is-an-example-of-why-land-should-move-to-public-ownership\/attachment\/11358921\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" alt=\"11358921\" height=\"349\" src=\"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/11358921.jpg\" width=\"620\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-4296\" srcset=\"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/11358921.jpg 620w, https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/11358921-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/11358921-500x281.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 620px) 100vw, 620px\" \/><\/a>The architects who own the two Titirangi sections with the precious kauri and rimu trees on them should have their land bought by the Local Board and the rent should be reduced because of the restrictions they suffer in building, according to the New Economics Party. <\/p>\n<p>Spokesperson Deirdre Kent said the tree issue in Titirangi is a graphic example of why land ownership should progressively move into public ownership. Local Boards should have power to create a second national currency to buy up community land. And if the use of the land is restricted because of historic building, conservation of trees or building height limits, the rent should be reduced as the part of the land already serves a public purpose.<\/p>\n<p>The land rent should be in lieu of rates and the revenue shared by other levels of government.<br \/>\nShe said  if the Auckland Council  (preferably the Local Board if it had the power) buys this land destined for low cost housing there will be four beneficial outcomes:<br \/>\n1.\tThe trees can be saved<br \/>\n2.\tthe housing produced will be genuinely low cost because the cost of the land will not be included into the cost of the housing<br \/>\n3.\tthe citizens Auckland will enjoy a dividend from the land rental in perpetuity<br \/>\n4.\tThe citizens of New Zealand will enjoy a more bouyant economy as lower cost of housing results in lower mortgage payments therefore less interest payments and less bank profits streaming across the Tasman to Australia.<br \/>\n\u201cThe financing of land purchase on a large scale is eminently possible. It is only political will that is needed to create a second national currency that can be spent into existence through land purchase by councils,\u201d said Ms Kent<\/p>\n<p>For further comment phone Deirdre Kent 06 364 7779 or 021 728 852<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The architects who own the two Titirangi sections with the precious kauri and rimu trees on them should have their land bought by the Local Board and the rent should be reduced because of the restrictions they suffer in building, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/2015\/03\/the-tree-issue-in-titirangi-is-an-example-of-why-land-should-move-to-public-ownership\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[20,721,291],"tags":[398,764,268,407,765,763],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4294"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4294"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4294\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5009,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4294\/revisions\/5009"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}