{"id":3033,"date":"2013-05-19T23:33:35","date_gmt":"2013-05-19T23:33:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/?p=3033"},"modified":"2013-08-17T22:24:10","modified_gmt":"2013-08-17T22:24:10","slug":"a-systems-approach-to-universal-basic-income-monetary-reform-and-tax-reform","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/2013\/05\/a-systems-approach-to-universal-basic-income-monetary-reform-and-tax-reform\/","title":{"rendered":"A systems approach to Universal Basic Income, monetary reform and tax reform"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"images-2\"<\/a>
\nOne of the biggest political challenges is to clean up the welfare mess. So many people have known for so long that means tested welfare is not working. We have seen good people not able to earn more than $80 a week or their benefit would be docked. We have seen de facto couples split up so they can get more combined income, a terrible situation if we want to foster intimacy and honesty.<\/p>\n

The movement for a Universal Basic Income <\/a>\u2013 a proposed system of social security that regularly provides each citizen with a sum of money unconditionally \u2013 has been going for many decades now. Advocated by both socialists and libertarians, to my knowledge there is still no sign that any political party is taking it seriously. The long list of benefits can be found on Wikipedia.<\/p>\n

I couldn\u2019t help reflecting on the absence of a UBI when Parliament recently debated the Bill to pay those who care for highly dependent adult children the minimum income. All sorts of other questions arose from that debate. The government was clearly terrified that this precedent, forced on them by a Court of Appeal decision, was going to lead to an uncontrollable blowout of claims for government support for those who care for dependents.<\/p>\n

When you do the sums the cost of UBI is enormous. Bringing in a full basic income would shock the economy.<\/p>\n

It is the same with changing from a system where income tax and sales tax and company tax dominate the sources of Government revenue to a tax system where you are taxing the monopoly use of the commons, in particular the use of the land.\u00a0 It would be a massive shock the economy.<\/p>\n

And then again there is another one. Carry out massive monetary reform of the national money system and whoosh, it is all too much of a shock to the economy.<\/p>\n

\"images\"<\/a>I was on a skype call the other day with a wonderful young permaculturist from the Canary Islands, Stella Strega Scoz. She was enthusing about the systems approach to big problems \u2013 look at the problem as a system and tackle it as a whole.\u00a0 And during the online course that Stella ran (Eonova<\/a>), I learnt that Hazel Henderson also enthuses, and that the wonderful Donnella Meadows (Limits to Growth) had written a book called Thinking in Systems: a Primer<\/i> quite a while ago. Hazel told me that the influential economics professor Jeffery Sachs is also a now a convert to systems thinking.<\/p>\n

The challenge to our political creativity is to face these three big problems together.<\/p>\n

So let\u2019s look at the permaculture teaching that new growth comes gradually from the decaying old system. Hazel says \u201cBreakdown brings breakthrough\u201d. Leave the old system to die and start up a lot of new initiatives. The Living Economies Educational Trust<\/a> has been a pioneer in its support of complementary currencies like time banks, and now of a growing number of savings pools which leave out banks.<\/p>\n

\"images-1\"<\/a>I believe we (both in New Zealand and in the world) are capable together of finding a solution to all three of these big problems together, and in a way that doesn\u2019t shock the economy. Our solution must introduce a scaled-up complementary system that creates a healthy interest free currency, puts a full ground rent on at least some land and which redistributes this income in the form of a small per person Citizens Dividend. Who said creativity is confined to artists and scientists? Political creativity seems to be underrecognised and undervalued.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

One of the biggest political challenges is to clean up the welfare mess. So many people have known for so long that means tested welfare is not working. We have seen good people not able to earn more than $80 … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[220],"tags":[541,542,106,235,540,101,539,136],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3033"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3033"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3033\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3043,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3033\/revisions\/3043"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}