{"id":2359,"date":"2012-06-14T22:39:26","date_gmt":"2012-06-14T22:39:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/?p=2359"},"modified":"2013-08-19T02:08:10","modified_gmt":"2013-08-19T02:08:10","slug":"low-interest-rates-fuelling-another-housing-boom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/2012\/06\/low-interest-rates-fuelling-another-housing-boom\/","title":{"rendered":"Low interest rates fuelling another housing boom?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This morning we heard a commentator on radio expressing his concerns that the continuing low interest rates would fuel another housing boom. A valid concern.<\/p>\n<p>I remember a few years ago when I was arguing that interest rates should be zero, someone pooh poohed my argument and said &#8220;If anything interest rates should be higher.&#8221;\u00a0 There is the dilemma that Social Creditors and all monetary reformers need to face. Low interest rates bring on housing booms. Any real estate agent knows this. It is a fact of life under the current regime of holding land.<\/p>\n<p>And housing booms cause inflation which steals from all of us. As one of my colleagues wrote on a skype chat yesterday: &#8220;Why should I have to see my purchasing power eroded thanks to speculative property bubbles? Why should I be starved for working capital because the banks are lending into still more housing? Why should I accept official figures for CPI rates that exclude the price of land and therefore mask the real inflation rate? If given the choice between paying a land value tax which would by its design remain in the region (or country) and paying interest on a mortgage which will go to any number of collateralized note holders, I know which I will pick.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Auckland has over 20,000 homes which are above 1 million. A Campbell Live programme on housing affordability showed the price of home in Auckland so high that the average person on an average wage can&#8217;t afford to buy one.\u00a0 The average price in 2012 is $402,000 there, up from $$193,000 in 2002. During that time the average wage only went up 37%. That housing boom of 2002 to 2007 was the steepest on record.<\/p>\n<p>We are faced with a good sized challenge \u2013 to come up with policies which deliver radical monetary reform, (turning money on its head) and puts a big enough price on the holding of land sufficient to stop housing booms. It is a big challenge and discussion will help us develop these policies. We are committed to halting land speculation and committed to doing it in the most effective way.<\/p>\n<p><strong>We believe you should pay for what you hold or take but not for what you earn or make.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Wellington members are organising a meeting on July 1st, a Sunday afternoon to form a Wellington branch. No doubt they will be discussing policy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This morning we heard a commentator on radio expressing his concerns that the continuing low interest rates would fuel another housing boom. A valid concern. I remember a few years ago when I was arguing that interest rates should be &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/2012\/06\/low-interest-rates-fuelling-another-housing-boom\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13,328,16],"tags":[359,360],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2359"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2359"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2359\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2381,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2359\/revisions\/2381"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/neweconomics.net.nz\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}