You won't find this headline in the NZ Herald or the Dominion Post because it is all but ignored in their reports. Admittedly the Dominion Post gives the rating system a mention in paragraphs 16 and 17 of its report, but its headline was "User pays seem as vital for housing".
If we look at the actual report, Using Land for Housing, it argues logically that a return to land value rating system is going to incentivise building. After several pages of evidence it concludes very moderately that "A good case appears to exist for setting general rates on the basis of land value rather than capital value, to encourage the development and efficient use of land. Arguments used to prefer capital value rating are not strong."
"A number of policy settings would influence a landowner’s incentive to develop land, at the margin. This
section considers four:
the valuation basis of councils’ general rates;
tax breaks for development; and
charging rates on Crown-owned land."
The media of course will focus on on the last of these.
Go to P258 of the report and read the subsequent pages. Submissions on the draft report are due on 4 August